*The Untold Story of How Christian-Dominated Enclaves Sparked the Cycles of Violence Long Before Boko Haram and Banditry*
_By Dahiru Yusuf Yabo_
The Northern Nigerian crisis did not begin with Boko Haram. Long before the first insurgent detonated a bomb or the first herder was branded a criminal, the region had already been infiltrated by religious and ethnic militias — many from Christian-dominated enclaves of the Middle Belt — operating under local and foreign political cover. The later militarization of these conflicts coincided with Western interference and conditional arms restrictions that undermined Nigeria’s sovereignty and capacity to act. This essay traces the evolution of these conflicts, the double standards that sustain them, and their alignment with the familiar “American template” of controlled instability seen in Iraq, Libya, and beyond.
This essay is written as a historical and analytical intervention to correct distortions, not to inflame divisions. It calls for justice-based reconciliation rooted in truth, transparency, and the sovereignty of Nigeria’s collective memory.
*The Forgotten Genesis of the Northern Crisis*
Between the late 1970s and early 1990s, the Middle Belt region witnessed the gradual rise of faith-based militias often described as “community defence networks.” Behind their communal posture lay organized anti-Muslim sentiment reinforced by missionary and political influences. The 1992 Zango Kataf massacre — where thousands of Hausa-Fulani Muslims were murdered and entire settlements erased — predated Boko Haram by nearly two decades (see Human Rights Watch, “Nigeria: Communal Violence in Kaduna State,” 1992).
Throughout Plateau, Southern Kaduna, Benue, and Taraba, these militias entrenched cycles of reprisal and propaganda that demonized Islam while portraying Christians as perpetual victims. The Nigerian state, under military and later civilian regimes, failed to establish accountability or truth commissions capable of unmasking the perpetrators. This silence institutionalized impunity.
*The Plateau and Middle Belt Syndromes*
The transformation of Plateau from the “Home of Peace and Tourism” into a theatre of religious pogroms is one of Nigeria’s most tragic political reversals. The killings in Jos (2001, 2008, 2010) and in Wukari (2013) were not spontaneous riots but planned offensives against Muslim minorities (International Crisis Group Report No. 168, 2012).
In Benue, “Livestock Guards” became paramilitary outfits backed by state apparatus, while in Nasarawa and Taraba, Tiv and Taroh militias engaged in selective ethnic cleansing. In each instance, justice was sacrificed to political convenience, and narratives were inverted by national and foreign media to protect a Christian identity.
*The Southern Parallel and Selective Outrage*
In the South-West, ethnic militias such as the Oodua Peoples Congress (OPC) and later Sunday Igboho’s Oodua Nation group carried out targeted killings and displacements of Northern traders and settlers (see BBC Africa, “Nigeria: Igboho’s Oodua Nation Movement,” July 2021). Yet these atrocities were framed as “regional self-determination,” not terrorism.
This selective outrage reflects a global media bias that reserves the term “terrorist” for Muslim actors while sanitizing others as “freedom fighters.”
*The Boko Haram Paradox — From Rebellion to Proxy*
When Boko Haram emerged between 2002 and 2009, its early religious radicalism was quickly hijacked and instrumentalized by domestic and foreign interests. Evidence from multiple security sources shows that arms embargoes and conditional military support from Western allies crippled Nigeria’s initial counterinsurgency efforts (US Congressional Research Service, “Nigeria’s Boko Haram: Frequently Asked Questions,” 2016).
Foreign partners imposed restrictions under the Leahy Laws, citing human rights concerns, even as the same powers armed Saudi Arabia in Yemen and NATO operations in Libya without moral restraint.
This duplicity created a vacuum that allowed insurgents to expand unchallenged. Meanwhile, “surgical” military operations often turned into collective punishment of innocent communities. Civilian casualties, media propaganda, and uncoordinated engagement destroyed trust between the people and the state.
*Inside the Security Labyrinth*
Nigeria’s war against insurgency became an economic theatre rather than a patriotic mission. Multiple insider leaks revealed stand-down orders, friendly fire incidents, and deliberate ambushes of soldiers in remote theatres — indicators of deep infiltration within the security structure (SaharaReporters, “Inside Nigeria’s Military Betrayal,” 2018).
Negotiations with known terrorist kingpins, granting of state amnesty, and “repentant” insurgent reintegration schemes contradicted every declared objective of total defeat. The annual defence budgets exceeding ₦2 trillion (2019–2024) remain largely unaudited, converting insecurity into a perpetual revenue stream.
*The American Template: Controlled Chaos and the ‘Act-Before-You-Think’ Doctrine*
Nigeria’s insecurity bears striking resemblance to Washington’s “strategic destabilization” blueprint, where instability becomes a mechanism for influence rather than an accident of policy. The same doctrine was deployed in Iraq (2003), Libya (2011), and Afghanistan — acting before thinking, invading before planning, and withdrawing before stabilizing.
In Libya, NATO’s intervention under the pretext of “protecting civilians” destroyed a functioning state and unleashed regional terrorism that later bled into the Sahel (Chatham House, “After Qaddafi: Instability in North Africa,” 2013).
In Nigeria’s case, Western powers used embargoes and selective intelligence to weaken local autonomy while fostering dependence on “technical assistance” and “joint operations.” Thus, the Northern crisis became not just an internal problem but a geopolitical commodity managed through proxy diplomacy.
*Truth, Justice, and the Road to Redemption*
The Nigerian narrative must be rewritten — not to exonerate any group, but to expose the full circle of complicity. The Zango Kataf, Jos, and Benue massacres of Muslims must occupy the same moral weight as attacks in Chibok or Baga. Justice cannot be selective, and empathy cannot be partisan.
The North does not seek sympathy; it seeks honesty and accountability. The current insecurity is not a religious war but a political enterprise built on distortion. Unless Nigeria dismantles this architecture of deceit — internally sustained and externally reinforced — peace will remain a decorative word in official speeches.
*Conclusion*
Nigeria stands at the crossroads between truth and oblivion. The history of Northern Nigeria’s crises must be confronted with courage, not censorship. The same Western strategy that turned Iraq and Libya into graveyards must not be allowed to define Nigeria’s fate through policy manipulation or arms dependency.
Only by reclaiming our historical truth, auditing our security institutions, and balancing our national narrative can we rebuild a just and united federation where neither faith nor ethnicity is weaponized for profit.
*References:*
1. _Human Rights Watch. Nigeria: Communal Violence in Kaduna State, 1992._
2. _International Crisis Group. Curbing Violence in Nigeria (I): The Jos Crisis, Africa Report No. 168, 2012._
3. _U.S. Congressional Research Service. Nigeria’s Boko Haram: Frequently Asked Questions, 2016._
4. _BBC Africa. Nigeria: Igboho’s Oodua Nation Movement, July 2021._
5. _SaharaReporters. Inside Nigeria’s Military Betrayal, 2018._
6. _Chatham House. After Qaddafi: Instability in North Africa, 2013._
_By Dahiru Yusuf Yabo_
_Political Analyst | Public Servant | Former Gubernatorial Candidate, Sokoto State_
0 Comments